Susan works as a sales representative in QLink - a biscuit manufacturing company. Over the years the company has been making huge sales which has led it to open over five branches within a space of three years. Susan was elevated to head one of the new branches opened by the company.
This is the third year running and the branch headed by Susan has been recording huge losses. During the year's annual general meeting, it was resolved that Susan's branch be audited by another auditor different from the one that has been auditing the company, especially the one headed by Susan.
When the new auditor came, he requested for several documents including cash receipts, invoice and all that. At the conclusion of his audit, Susan was indicted and was asked to refund huge sums of money to the company's coffers.
When Susan's attention was drawn to it she became extremely furious asking what exactly the auditor did and how he arrived at his findings.
The next day, the company issued its white paper indicting Susan based on the latest company's audit. When a copy was served on Susan she could not believe her eyes. "Analyst of what exactly if I may as?" How did this man arrive at his findings?"
Susan was given thirty days to make a full refund of the embezzled money or else be handed over to the police.
This is my entry for the day's @daily.prompt: Analyst Of What
