RE: SportsTalkSocial: A Little Light at the End of the Tunnel?

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: SportsTalkSocial: A Little Light at the End of the Tunnel?

forykw in Sports Talk Social • last year (edited)

Do we want to continue as we are (aimless), or would we prefer to create centralized community management and still try to improve things?

Let's try to prove this blockchain can do something right about governance long term... I believe it's possible.

All it needs is people's will... aside from that hunger for profits...
And with history, I know some will care!

So, aimless or not, let's propose someone to lead... whom'ever wants to, be voted by the community and then pass responsibilities. This does not need any blockchain tech, just interested people, some time and then validation of consensus.

last year in Sports Talk Social by forykw

0.00 ALIVE

Sort:

Trending

[-]

cryptosimplify last year

I can be the people that will be responsible to keep the community accounts ownership at least until we have decided which community users will take control

0.00 ALIVE

[-]

forykw last year

There is also the possibility of multi-sig... and I would be up for it if that would bring more governance value. But we need to discuss that if people would be interested.

0.00 ALIVE

[-]

cryptosimplify last year

I think the step of multi-sig needs to be very discussed because if people go away from Hive I can return a state like we have today.

0.00 ALIVE