I thought that the correct expense is expensive
on your comment is a sentence by itself, whose opposite may be "incorrect expense is cheap". š¤Æš
Here's some !BBH which you also !love! š !ALIVE
I thought that the correct expense is expensive
on your comment is a sentence by itself, whose opposite may be "incorrect expense is cheap". š¤Æš
Here's some !BBH which you also !love! š !ALIVE
š'correct, expense is expensive'. š
šššāØš¤
!ALIVE
!BBH
!LUV
Your "keyboard autocorrect" seems to simply omitted the comma on your comment there, essentially making a "sneak attack". š¤Æš¤£
!WINEX
!LUV
!ALIVE
Yep, simple little things make all the difference! š š š ⨠š¤
!ALIVE
!BBH
!LUV
It reminds me of the sentence A woman without her man is nothing
whose meaning totally changes when punctuation is added, such that the sentence becomes A woman - without her, man is nothing
. š
An alternate version of the original sentence is A woman, without her man, is nothing
. š¤
I wonder how "women" entered our conversations, such as you reminded me about it 3 days ago. š¤Æš
!INDEED
!LUV
!ALIVE