You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Revisiting History: Did Caliph Sulaiman Truly Halt the Muslim Conquests? [ENG-URDU]

in Deep Dives17 days ago (edited)

Pravesh0 I feel sorry for u as u have no idea what's written by AI reply u dropped as u depend too much on it. I have all the answers but first of all when I reply, u don't read them. It takes me hours to manually write your nonsense's replies.

You are being ignorant about history and taking 2 mins to troll someone discrediting their everything just because AI told u.

It's not the first time. Won't be your last time.

Do u think I should reply them? When someone don't even read, just introduces doubts for other readers onchain and offchain.

You know i debunked most of your points just reading them because they r stupidity to me. But well, u r soo smart cause u can use AI..... Very genius very original.

I don't even wanna talk about how i felt seeing your approach to everything time and time again.

This is not a debate as u never debate. U just drop, discredit others and leaves. Only your side is always correct and all the rest of the world is wrong.

I will reply u when I will feel like replying. But please say things u understand atleast. U r not as smart on this topic as u r assuming.

Sort:  

I am smart enough to sense BS when it's BS.

AI is nothing but a source to collect information from the internet quickly. Don't discredit it if the information goes against you. Rather, try to counter it on point by point basis. AI is not perfect, might never be... but much better at exposing lies that are widely known on the internet.

Pravesh0 I feel sorry for u as u have no idea what's written by AI reply u dropped as u depend too much on it.

You are doubting my ability to read and consume information? lol

Even a teenager will get what was written in that AI's reply. How many times will you collectively disregard Al Tabri's works just because they don't suit your causes in modern times? Poor guy must be so pissed at this point.

Only your side is always correct and all the rest of the world is wrong.

Rest of the world or your made-up story world?

ChatGPT is good for summarizing a single news article or two, but is not a reliable source for overall news. And the same goes for other social media -- people who only get news from Facebook, for example, will be lacking much of the overall story.

Classic deception technique. Attack the medium and try to discredit it rather than the message. If you think the sources and reference given by the AI is false then present counter sources. I never saw any in that post or in replies.

But rather than talking on facts and arguments it is so easy to attack the messenger. Talk about every other thing than facts. Perfect!

If you think the sources and reference given by the AI is false then present counter sources.

I have answers but I like to debate with humans not AI prompts

Yeah, you are right. I am not a human. LOL