Christianity and the Hidden Cost of Relevance

in The Kingdom6 days ago

The 21st-century church is obsessed with relevance. Trend-chasing, algorithm-friendly, emotionally resonant — many modern expressions of faith bend toward what is palatable rather than what is true.

Relevance is a trap that comes at the cost of distinction. Jesus wasn’t crucified for His relatedness. He was crucified for making bold claims — about Himself and those around Him. He offended religious power and disrupted those who thought they knew Him. His kingdom made the kingdoms of this world jittery.

Making Christ relevant isn’t wrong. But when the gospel is repackaged to sound like a TEDx talk, it loses something. Holiness isn’t marketable. Discipleship isn’t easy. And resurrection power isn’t a bullet point list.

We don’t need to make the gospel relevant. It’s already relevant because it speaks to what it means to be human.

The challenge isn’t updating the gospel. It’s living it.

So maybe the question for 21st-century believers isn’t, "How do we stay relevant? "Maybe it’s, "How do we stay faithful?"

Have you read my testimony?

First published at Substack. Image by Whisk.

Posted Using INLEO

Sort:  

I love this!! How do we stay faithful rather than being relevant in serving God.
Living according to the word of God and practicing it, is about being faithful to his commands.

Doing things in his name that does not edify him but edifie's our own flesh, are what makes us relevant not him, because he does not need it, he will forever be God and nothing can change that.

That is exactly right! Thanks for a great comment.

Ur wlc

Jesus was able to teach scripture using parables so that his followers could better understand their meaning.

With the popularity of sola scriptura, the Church can ill afford to have parishioners also start making their own interpretations. While it can be interesting to get into theological discussions, most people aren't as involved as that. Parables were able to relate the spirit of scripture rather than get lost in the detail. Similarly, if the Church is able to better explain the Gospel, people wouldn't go off reading mistaken interpretations. We mustn't presume that because most people can read these days that they are scholarly.

One need not be a scholar to understand the scriptures.

No, but the odds of misinterpreting scripture increase without proper guidance. It is so easy to read verses out of context and give them more meaning than was intended.

Or a different meaning altogether. But I've noticed that even those with seminary training revert to proof-texting, and many seminary- and Bible school-trained pastors just parrot what they've learned in school without questioning whether what they've been taught is right. So, "proper guidance" is a bit elusive.