That would actually make Rep useful for something for once!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Sort: Trending
So u r saying world-travel-pro can have 76 reputation and keep false flagging while having rewards declined so we can't even reduce reputation.
Anyone with high reputation once gone anti hive can stop our ability to reduce their reputation while continuing to exploit phishing flagging feature.
A sum of all reporters should be more than x HP like passing a return proposal isn't easy.
So here flagging (reporting) with having a dynamic HP requirement. Passing it won't be easier so it takes collective TRUST.
The reporting system does not require flagging. Perhaps that's the snag you're hung up on. Whether people flag or not, they can simply report the link as suspicious. Once enough folks have reported the suspicious link, attention from more eyes will likely enable flagging.
No he can't. He'd have to have >4 accounts to exceed the threshhold for triggering the report, all above 76 rep, with the threshhold at ~250.
"Anyone with high reputation once gone anti hive can stop our ability to reduce their reputation..."
How is that relevant? A single account with high rep cannot trigger the report when the threshold is set ~250.
Do you require that you increase the power of substantially staked accounts on Hive? I see no other reason you insist on linking reporting to stake. Several high rep accounts can report a suspicious link if you use rep as a metric. Any whale can report a suspicious link, and 10k minnows could not, if you insist on a high stake threshold for reporting.
Why do you insist on stake as a metric?