You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Anti-Phishing Proposed Solution

in Hive Learnersyesterday (edited)

If u r talking about reputation score, anyone can get hacked with 60 or more reputation and it will take alot of downvotes to reduce it to negative score (till then, more accounts would be compromised).

This is a stake based system to protect the nature of decentralization.

If you are talking about few people reporting it, then have high requirements and u can follow proxy (same proxy proposal and witnesses but a sperate proxy feature to not merge with those 2) reports of anyone thus your REPUTABLE reporters can also fit in this current model. Sorry I am not understanding u currently. Do u mean reputation score? If yes, it's not effective in this wide spread airdrop scams and memo transfers. Some users recover account in 5 days at max so we have to negative reputation them which is a very serious punishment.

Sort:  

"This is a stake based system to protect the nature of decentralization."

Stake has utterly failed to decentralize Hive.

"...have high requirements..."

Then only whales can trigger the report.

Using reputation score enables longstanding users to trigger the report when at least a couple people report it. Using stake enables 1 whale to do so, potentiating manipulation for financial benefit.

"anyone can get hacked with 60 or more reputation..."

How does that game the reporting system? With the threshold at ~250, they'd have to have 3 accounts to overcome the threshold, even if the accounts were >80 rep.

Then only whales can trigger the report.

Minnows can join proxy voting similar system for reports with collective power exceeding whales.

So, 10's of thousands of minnows would be required to exceed the high threshold?

Silly. Why? Also, all the minnows, dolphins, and orcas combined cannot exceed the majority of stake maintained by ~36 whales continuously since the platform advented in 2016.