high HP doesn't mean trust as well...
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Sort: Trending
A sum of all reporters should be more than x HP like passing a return proposal isn't easy.
So here flagging (reporting) with having a dynamic HP requirement. Passing it won't be easier so it takes collective TRUST.
One really. That's why there's 0 accounting for any disbursements of DHF funds, and the principals of VP have absolutely refused to provide receipts to disprove credible allegations of theft by fraud.
All of us, the ~1964 users of Hive that aren't the ~36 whales that completely control Hive governance, should vote the Return Proposal until all proposals provide accounting for all disbursements of DHF funds. VP has spent $M's of our money with zero accounting, and we're just begging for thieves to steal our money at this point.
I dont know the exact number. But it doesn't take a lot of whales to pass proposals x)
Too much pandering and too many riding on coat tails have all but disabled the Return Proposal from preventing the exact problem that is occurring, the profligate spending of funds intended to develop Hive for frivolous and larcenous purposes.
We all should be voting only the Return Proposal until the bleeding of our stake ends and all proposals commit to providing factual accounting for their disbursement of our money.
Without GAAP we might as well be throwing our money out the window, and have achieved exactly the results doing that would.
The reporting system does not require flagging. Perhaps that's the snag you're hung up on. Whether people flag or not, they can simply report the link as suspicious. Once enough folks have reported the suspicious link, attention from more eyes will likely enable flagging.