About half a year has passed since Melinda and some active #Ecency users noticed that some other Ecency users shot up to the top of the #Ecency Engagement Leaderboards quickly even with (very) short and similar comments, and nothing still apparently changed on how Ecency engagement leaders are displayed. 🧘♂️🤯
Indeed. I think that it would have been better to resolve the underlying mechanism that allowed useless comments to rise to the top, rather than changing the nature of the contest. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!ALIVE
!BBH
!INDEED
!WEIRD
It's probably because the word "useless" is useless in nearly all sentences. 🤯😅
!ALIVE
!LOLZ
It reminds of the !MEME about totally useless things, such as a handle inside a cup and a door intentionally placed in the middle of a path on an open field (though the cup may be four-dimensional and the door may be a teleporter in disguise)! 🤯🤣😂
!WEIRD !INDEED !WINEX !ALIVE
I think that Melinda could use (better if from the Ecency dev team) a script which determines the average number of words (or characters) on the comments of the Top 10 users on the #Ecency Weekly Engagement Leaderboard such that users with very low averages won't get prizes, !INSTEAD of changing the way winners are selected. 🧘♂️🤯🤓
!WEIRD
!ALIVE
!WINEX
Yes, I agree, that was another good option. Bjorn could have whipped one up quickly I'm sure. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!ALIVE
!BBH
!INDEED
!WEIRD
In that case, I would suggest one of Melinda and Bjorn talk to the other regarding such useful script, though I think that Melinda won't simply change back how #Ecency Weekly Engagement Leaders are awarded just because of certain tools. 🤯😅
!ALIVE
!LOLZ
Yeah, it's doubtful that she'd change back, so best just to accept and move forward. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!ALIVE
!LOLZ
At least, if Melinda and Bjorn would talk to each other, then Melinda would be more prepared for future concerns that may arise regarding her #Ecency Weekly Engagement Leaderboard awarding. 🤗😎
!HOPE !INDEED !WINEX !ALIVE !HUG
