Indeed, and that saddens me. Mutually-Beneficial systems are what we need to create, regardless of the Hive domain. πππβ¨π€
!ALIVE
!HUG
Indeed, and that saddens me. Mutually-Beneficial systems are what we need to create, regardless of the Hive domain. πππβ¨π€
!ALIVE
!HUG
Perhaps more members on your Maximum Mutual Benefit project team (here on Hive) would help speed up your production of "mutually-beneficial systems" !INDEED! π I still think of @pepetoken as a good candidate for being the third member of your team. πΈπ
!HOPE !WEIRD !PIZZA !HUG
We can definitely still talk about the idea, though he hasn't been around that much lately, plus a lot of wind got taken out of our sails by the downvoting of our bots, so we haven't really focused on it lately. Bjorn is also busy most of the time, which also doesn't help. I've mostly been focused on building and growing the We Are Alive Tribe. π π π β¨ π€
!HOPE
!HUG
!INDEED
!PIZZA
!WEIRD
I think that if the token tipping bots that you co-created with Bjorn don't leave a comment on the comments section where they are called for every (successful or failed) token tipping attempt, then it would be unlikely for them to get the attention of flaggers. π§ββοΈ For example, since the WINEX and HUG bots don't leave comments on every token tip where they are used and !INSTEAD comment under only their own posts, they pretty much were able to avoid negative attention. π€
!HOPE !INDEED !WEIRD !PIZZA
Yes, but for us, removing the tip comments didn't stop the downvotes, unfortuantely. πππβ¨π€
!HOPE
!INDEED
!PIZZA
!WEIRD
I forgot to add "for new token tipping projects" on my previous comment !INDEED. π€―π
!LOLZ
Ah, OK, that is perhaps more accurate. πππβ¨π€
!INDEED
!LOLZ
I think that if people on Hive who like flagging have put a particular Hive account onto its list, it is already (very) unlikely for them to remove it. π€―
!WEIRD
!LOLZ