I know that both scenarios are bad, though the question is which is less worse. 🤯
I think that projects that start as FOSS but then continue as closed-source are less worse, because the users can simply fork the latest FOSS version of the project !INDEED. 🤓
!WEIRD !ALIVE !MMB !HOH
Yeah, I suppose any FOSS is better than no FOSS. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!ALIVE
!BBH
!HEARTBEAT
!INDEED
!MMB
!WEIRD
That "any FOSS" might not be any better than "no FOSS" if there are "no eyes looking" at the source code (and contributing to it) !INDEED. 🧘♂️🤯🤓
!ALIVE !MMB !STRIDE !PIXY
True, it's good that it exists, but it's far better if it's regularly reviewed, and that it has ongoing contributions to the code. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!ALVE
!BBH
!MMB
!PIXY
!STRIDE
It would be bad though if such FOSS codes get deleted without getting backed up on a censorship-resistant platform (such as Hive) !INDEED, except when such code does not have any good use. 🤯🤓
!ALIVE and !MMB
!BBH
!PIXY
Indeed, and as I always say, backups and redundancy are exceedingly good things. 😁 🙏 💚 ✨ 🤙
!ALIVE
!BBH
!INDEED
!MMB
!PIXY