If I were to run multiple different kinds of nodes, Hive versions or other otherwise, I would have each on their own laptop. πππβ¨π€
!BEER
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Sort: Β Trending
That's !INDEED what @savvytester (and also I) thinks is a good practice when running nodes, such that when one node fails (catastrophically) and eats up the entire system's computing resources, the other nodes would barely be affected (if at all) as they are in separate computers. π
!WEIRD
!HOPE
!WINEX
It's a good practice, I'd say, since running more than one node on one system is just asking for problems. πππβ¨π€
!HOPE
!INDEED
!WINE
!WEIRD
There's the fact though that even when nodes are separate but they are connected through the same local network, the other nodes might have difficulty synchronizing if one node tries to eat up all the network bandwidth !INDEED. π€―π€
!WEIRD
!HOPE
!UNICOIN
Indeed, which is why a high-bandwidth, no-cap, stable, consistent, and reliable internet connection is necessary, along with managing how much each node can access at one time. πππβ¨π€
!HOPE
!INDEED
!UNICOIN
!WEIRD
Given nearly all of the world needs the Internet at present, it would seem weird indeed if a wired Internet connection has a data cap. π€―
Periods of network connection loss (also at present, for any reason) get less tolerable over time. π€―π
You're missing a word at the beginning of that sentence. When I mention a data cap, I mean that it is not an unlimited connection, so beyond a certain point, bandwidth slows immensely. I don't know how many people in the world deal with such intermittent internet. As an example of data use that would not work on capped data connection, I use about 4TB of bandwidth every month, most of which is from my Qortal node, and Arch Linux updates. πππβ¨π€
!ALIVE
!HOPE
!INDEED
!UNICOIN
!WEIRD
I know that throttling by certain Internet Service Providers, such that exceeding the data cap for a given period of time (usually a day and/or a month) makes the ISP severely reduce the network speed (such as down to 1 megabyte per second) until the next "period". π€―
It's understandable though that mobile networks have data caps, as wireless Internet connections directly to the ISP are (currently) more expensive than wired ones. πΈπ
!ALIVE
Yep, those kinds of internet connections would not at all work with how I do things.
Interestingly, on our old internet service, which used the T-Mobile network, we never had a problem with data use, but now with StarLink, it seems like it's a thing, so we may be going back to the old system, much to my chagrin. πππβ¨π€
!ALIVE