You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: OUCH - IT HURTS LOOSING WITNESS SUPPORTERS

in LeoFinance β€’ 7 days ago

It's a good practice, I'd say, since running more than one node on one system is just asking for problems. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!HOPE
!INDEED
!WINE
!WEIRD

Sort: Β 

There's the fact though that even when nodes are separate but they are connected through the same local network, the other nodes might have difficulty synchronizing if one node tries to eat up all the network bandwidth !INDEED. πŸ€―πŸ€“

!WEIRD
!HOPE
!UNICOIN

Indeed, which is why a high-bandwidth, no-cap, stable, consistent, and reliable internet connection is necessary, along with managing how much each node can access at one time. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!HOPE
!INDEED
!UNICOIN
!WEIRD

Given nearly all of the world needs the Internet at present, it would seem weird indeed if a wired Internet connection has a data cap. 🀯

Periods of network connection loss (also at present, for any reason) get less tolerable over time. πŸ€―πŸ˜…

You're missing a word at the beginning of that sentence. When I mention a data cap, I mean that it is not an unlimited connection, so beyond a certain point, bandwidth slows immensely. I don't know how many people in the world deal with such intermittent internet. As an example of data use that would not work on capped data connection, I use about 4TB of bandwidth every month, most of which is from my Qortal node, and Arch Linux updates. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!ALIVE
!HOPE
!INDEED
!UNICOIN
!WEIRD

I know that throttling by certain Internet Service Providers, such that exceeding the data cap for a given period of time (usually a day and/or a month) makes the ISP severely reduce the network speed (such as down to 1 megabyte per second) until the next "period". 🀯

It's understandable though that mobile networks have data caps, as wireless Internet connections directly to the ISP are (currently) more expensive than wired ones. πŸ’ΈπŸ˜…

!ALIVE

Yep, those kinds of internet connections would not at all work with how I do things.

Interestingly, on our old internet service, which used the T-Mobile network, we never had a problem with data use, but now with StarLink, it seems like it's a thing, so we may be going back to the old system, much to my chagrin. πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!ALIVE

Let's !HOPE that you (and your fellow local jungle community members) are not stuck with a 24-month (to 60-month or something) contract with your current Internet Service Provider, just in case you already want to switch ISPs again! πŸ€―πŸ€—

!ALIVE
!HBIT

savvyplayer, you mined 0.9 🟧 HBIT and the user you replied to (tydynrain) received 0.1 HBIT on your behalf as a tip. When you mine HBIT, you're also playing the Wusang: Isle of Blaq game. πŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ

Sorry, but you didn't find a bonus treasure token today. Try again tomorrow...they're out there! Your random number was 0.9475904293079985, also viewable in the Discord server, #hbit-wusang-log channel. | tools | wallet | discord | community | daily <><

Check for bonus treasure tokens by entering your username at a block explorer A, explorer B, or take a look at your wallet.
There is a treasure chest of bitcoin sats hidden in Wusang: Isle of Blaq. Happy treasure hunting! πŸ˜ƒ Read about Hivebits (HBIT) or read the story of Wusang: Isle of Blaq.

No, we're good for another month, in which time the new router for the old system should arrive. I still like StarLink a lot better than the old system, however, for a few reasons.πŸ˜πŸ™πŸ’šβœ¨πŸ€™

!ALIVE
!HOPE
!ZOMBIE