Yes, and choosing good candidates to help, so as not to waste our time, energy, and resources. π π π β¨ π€
!ALIVE
!INDEED
!ZOMBIE
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Sort: Β Trending
It's necessary indeed to perform "background checks" to people we plan to help, as to not fall victim to "scammers" (people who abuse kindness) and the like. π§ββοΈπ€―
!PIZZA
!ALIVE
I've generally not had to do that, as I get a very good sense of people just sharing conversations with them over time, and also observing how they do things on the blockchain. πππβ¨π€
!ALIVE
!PIZZA
In that case, you simply having a (casual) conversation with someone over time (generally anywhere, but particularly on Hive) is a good substitute to "background checking". π€
!LOLZ
!ALIVE
Yes, generally I've found that to be the case. πππβ¨π€
!ALIVE
!LOLZ
I got curious about what you think about the Hive blockchain's PEPE frog @pepetoken, apart from the "fact" that it is a PEPE frog (or probably the PEPE frog) of Hive. ππΈ
Anyway, this is one of the comments that disappeared from #Ecency, so I needed to type this reply again. π€― I always check on another Hive blogging frontend (which is #PeakD in this case) if a comment that I tried to publish on Ecency is indeed successful. π€ There's the chance though that Ecency will publish my previous comment after some time, which will become a duplicate comment if it happens. π
!PIZZA
!ALIVE
!STRIDE
Well, I don't know him in any other context than that.
More Ecency fun to be had by all it would seem. πππβ¨π€
!ALIVE
!PIZZA
!STRIDE