The "neutral" rabbits, while being able to detect both (hidden) "goodness" and "evilness" inside other rabbits, it might not be as accurate as either the "good" or "evil" rabbits. 🤔🐰🐇🤯
I accidentally typed d !INSTEAD of "dash" or - again. 🤯🤯😅
!LOLZ
I don't know, since they are neutral, I think that any variance from complete neutrality would be very detectable by them.
Ah, OK, I see, and you seem to have been having a few of those accidents lately...lol! 😁🙏💚✨🤙
LOLZ
While those "neutral" rabbits might easily detect hidden "goodness" or "evilness" from other rabbits, my previous comment already implies that how they measure such "goodness" or "evilness" might not be that accurate. 🤔🤯 Anyway, being "completely neutral" sounds very hard to achieve !INDEED, let alone maintain that state. 🐰🐇🤯🤯😅
!WEIRD
!HOPE
!WINEX
Well then their ability to detect non-neutrality rests on their detection method. Indeed, and I wouldn't want to be neutral. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!ALIVE
!BBH
!HOPE
!INDEED
!WEIRD
In that case, some (test) rabbits would rely not on their innate ability to detect hidden "goodness" or "evilness" but by an explicit detection method chosen by them. 🤔🤯
Maybe those rabbits have their own preferences too like humans do, such as choosing to be "neutral rabbits". 🐰🐇🤯😅
That all sounds very complicated. I think that I'd choose a far more simple test bunny. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!HOPE
!HUG
!INDEED
!WEIRD
Maybe you mean that you prefer to meet simply "good test rabbits", no "hidden extraordinary goodness" needed. 🤔🐰🐇🤯😆🤓
!WEIRD !INDEED !HOPE !WINEX
Well, both actually sound pretty great, so if I had the option, I'd go with both. 😁 🙏 💚 ✨ 🤙
!HOPE
!INDEED
!WINE
!WEIRD
That means you would have two types of "good" test rabbits - one type which is visibly good (that is not necessarily extremely good), and the other type which has a lot of hidden goodness !INDEED. 🤔🐰🐇🧘♂️🤯😅
!WEIRD !HOPE !PIZZA !HUG
