That is exactly one of the reason that open-source and open-weight AI and agents need to be freely available to anyone, so that everyone is on the same footing and playing field. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!ALIVE
!BBH
!ZOMBIE
That is exactly one of the reason that open-source and open-weight AI and agents need to be freely available to anyone, so that everyone is on the same footing and playing field. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!ALIVE
!BBH
!ZOMBIE
Let's !HOPE that more companies and dev teams whose project has an "open" or "free" word on its name is actually Free and Open-Source (FOSS) !INDEED! 🤗
!ALIVE
!MMB
!WINEX

Indeed, and unlike OpenAI, which began as a non-profit, but which went a very different direction. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!ALIVE
!BBH
!MMB
!PIXY
!UNICOIN
I wonder which among projects with a name that makes them appear FOSS but aren't really, or projects (regardless of the name) which are FOSS at first then becomes closed-source is less worse !INDEED. 🧘♂️🤯
!WEIRD
!ALIVE and !MMB
!WINEX

That's a good question, and I think both of those are pretty bad. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!ALIVE
!BBH
!MMB
!PIXY
!UNICOIN
I know that both scenarios are bad, though the question is which is less worse. 🤯
I think that projects that start as FOSS but then continue as closed-source are less worse, because the users can simply fork the latest FOSS version of the project !INDEED. 🤓
!WEIRD !ALIVE !MMB !HOH
Yeah, I suppose any FOSS is better than no FOSS. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!ALIVE
!BBH
!HEARTBEAT
!INDEED
!MMB
!WEIRD