That is exactly one of the reason that open-source and open-weight AI and agents need to be freely available to anyone, so that everyone is on the same footing and playing field. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!ALIVE
!BBH
!ZOMBIE
That is exactly one of the reason that open-source and open-weight AI and agents need to be freely available to anyone, so that everyone is on the same footing and playing field. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!ALIVE
!BBH
!ZOMBIE
Let's !HOPE that more companies and dev teams whose project has an "open" or "free" word on its name is actually Free and Open-Source (FOSS) !INDEED! 🤗
!ALIVE
!MMB
!WINEX

Indeed, and unlike OpenAI, which began as a non-profit, but which went a very different direction. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!ALIVE
!BBH
!MMB
!PIXY
!UNICOIN
I wonder which among projects with a name that makes them appear FOSS but aren't really, or projects (regardless of the name) which are FOSS at first then becomes closed-source is less worse !INDEED. 🧘♂️🤯
!WEIRD
!ALIVE and !MMB
!WINEX

That's a good question, and I think both of those are pretty bad. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!ALIVE
!BBH
!MMB
!PIXY
!UNICOIN
I know that both scenarios are bad, though the question is which is less worse. 🤯
I think that projects that start as FOSS but then continue as closed-source are less worse, because the users can simply fork the latest FOSS version of the project !INDEED. 🤓
!WEIRD !ALIVE !MMB !HOH
Yeah, I suppose any FOSS is better than no FOSS. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!ALIVE
!BBH
!HEARTBEAT
!INDEED
!MMB
!WEIRD
That "any FOSS" might not be any better than "no FOSS" if there are "no eyes looking" at the source code (and contributing to it) !INDEED. 🧘♂️🤯🤓
!ALIVE !MMB !STRIDE !PIXY
True, it's good that it exists, but it's far better if it's regularly reviewed, and that it has ongoing contributions to the code. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!ALVE
!BBH
!MMB
!PIXY
!STRIDE