Perhaps a project dev team can have many specialized testers based on platform, such as a Windows tester, Linux tester, Android smartphone/tablet tester, Mac tester, iOS tester, Firefox-based tester, Chromium-based tester, and so on !INDEED! šš¤Æš
!WEIRD
!HOPE
!UNICOIN
Yes, I think that'd be useful, as well as testers for the various iterations and combinations of hardware and OS. šššāØš¤
!HOPE
!INDEED
!UNICOIN
!WEIRD
I think that a very small subset of users of an app (which is #Ecency in this case) would be using non-typical combinations of hardware and OS, such as a Windows phone or an Android desktop. š
!PIZZA
!LOLZ
I don't even think Windows phones exist any more. and Android on a computer would have to be on an ARM processor, or be used in an emulator. Just covering all the main phones for Android would keep them busy. šššāØš¤
!LOLZ
!PIZZA
We can say though that those Windows OS phones exist mostly just for !FUN, so testers are no longer needed there !INDEED. š¤
!WEIRD
!ALIVE
!WINEX
Indeed, and Windows is a horrible choice on any hardware. šššāØš¤
!ALIVE
!INDEED
!WINE
!WEIRD
It indeed allocates a huge portion of the machine's computing resources just for "user-friendliness", and it also is expensive (compared to Linux OS distributions, even paid ones). šøš¤Æ
!PIZZA
!ALIVE
!UNICOIN
Indeed, and it uses system resources extremely poorly, plus all versions of Windows, but most especially the latest versions, are surveillance and data-collection horrors. šššāØš¤
!ALIVE
!PIZZA
!UNICOIN
Most of those people who need to use the Windows OS for any reason try their best to continue using 10 !INSTEAD of 11 !INDEED. š¤Æš¤
!PIZZA
!ALIVE
!UNICOIN