The more testers, across more hardware, the better. The Hive Keychain Android app, while functioning far better than it was, is still frustratingly unstable on my phone. Different amounts of RAM and processors should be tested too. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!LOLZ
!WEIRD
Perhaps a project dev team can have many specialized testers based on platform, such as a Windows tester, Linux tester, Android smartphone/tablet tester, Mac tester, iOS tester, Firefox-based tester, Chromium-based tester, and so on !INDEED! 😎🤯😅
!WEIRD
!HOPE
!UNICOIN
Yes, I think that'd be useful, as well as testers for the various iterations and combinations of hardware and OS. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!HOPE
!INDEED
!UNICOIN
!WEIRD
I think that a very small subset of users of an app (which is #Ecency in this case) would be using non-typical combinations of hardware and OS, such as a Windows phone or an Android desktop. 😅
!PIZZA
!LOLZ
I don't even think Windows phones exist any more. and Android on a computer would have to be on an ARM processor, or be used in an emulator. Just covering all the main phones for Android would keep them busy. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!LOLZ
!PIZZA
We can say though that those Windows OS phones exist mostly just for !FUN, so testers are no longer needed there !INDEED. 🤓
!WEIRD
!ALIVE
!WINEX
Indeed, and Windows is a horrible choice on any hardware. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!ALIVE
!INDEED
!WINE
!WEIRD
It indeed allocates a huge portion of the machine's computing resources just for "user-friendliness", and it also is expensive (compared to Linux OS distributions, even paid ones). 💸🤯
!PIZZA
!ALIVE
!UNICOIN
Indeed, and it uses system resources extremely poorly, plus all versions of Windows, but most especially the latest versions, are surveillance and data-collection horrors. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!ALIVE
!PIZZA
!UNICOIN