Yes, I know them. They used to be quite active players in the community, and I always had a good relationship with them. I don't know what problem you could have had with them.
In any case, none of them are part of the Rising Star team, either as administrators or moderators; they were just players like everyone else.
If stickupboys —or the leader of the “bro” community you mention—votes on Splinterlands content, does that justify downvoting all Splinterlands-related content posted by any user?
Um... I don't buy it. You still have plenty of rewards if you are not doing AI.
I don't have to like you content. I don't have to like you response. I should be able to downvote things I don't like.
The rewards from the publication are intended for the maintenance of servers for tools I developed for Hive.
It's a shame that you're trying to cut off my only source of funding, because it's clear that I can't get a proposal like the one that a FEW people have. In fact, I would love to because it would save me quite a few hours a week.
Since I can't, I put together a post that takes over an hour, in which I select a song that has something to say, make the cover, write at least 400-500 words about it, find images of the author, and add a video. Then I manually enter daily information, some of which is exclusive to my tool.
I am investing a lot of time in developing tools and constantly updating them, so the least I ask is not to have to contribute to the costs of the server and domain.
I have created the only NFT marketplace that currently exists for Hive Engine since the discontinuation of NFTMart.
The truth is that these downvotes only discourage me from continuing.
It's easy to say, but first you have to make the investment to set one up. Now, getting the necessary funding or support is another matter.
If games that have reached more than 10,000 users, such as Rising Star, have had proposals rejected simply because they weren't interested, what chance do I have?
But then you see proposals that are not at all serious and that are approved with inflated budgets.
Why are you doing it if you need funding but you don't have funding but you need it but you don't have it?
Why are you doing it if you need funding but you don't have funding but you need it but you don't have it?
With what I'm earning now (which is still not much), I can just about afford to pay for the VPS where all the tools and pages are hosted, as well as the domains and other expenses of that kind. It seems you want to take even that away from me.
If you want to vote negatively, that's your right. Just as it's my right to discontinue tools that many users use because I have to put money out of my own pocket in addition to the hundreds of FREE hours I put into it.
It's a shame that this happened, because I have nothing to do with whoever you have problems with.
I don’t like super repetitive posts either.
It’s not just brofi vote.
I don’t think you should be doing posts just to make money. If everyone does it, it’s not sustainable in my opinion.