While that may be "ridiculous" !INDEED, it (unfortunately) happens though. π€π€― The leader of the dev team should encourage each dev to communicate with each other. π§ββοΈπ€
That also reminds me of what I said a year ago that "four is the ideal team size". ππ
!WEIRD
!HOPE
!PIZZA
Oh, I know, and I see it all the time, sadly. Any people, in any context, working together on the same project, need to effectively communicate with each other, or their efforts will clash at some point. Also there would be a lot of stupid semi-functional or buggy parts.
I'd say passion, purpose, and mission are more significant in uniting a team into a coherent, effective, and efficient developmental unit, as with that the size of the team is less significant. πππβ¨π€
!HOPE
!INDEED
!PIZZA
!WEIRD
I notice that when most (or all) of the original team members of a dev team have already been replaced by new ones, the code is sometimes reorganized ("refactored") !INDEED to remove unneeded or buggy code. π€π€
I see most software dev teams being forced to work longer hours (instead of incorporating a new team member) just to meet project deadlines, which we !HOPE happens less often. π§ββοΈπ€―π¨βπ»
!WEIRD
!PIZZA
Yes, often true, though not all refactors or rewrites are actually better than their previous iterations.
That's where agentic-AI coding assistance would be useful, as it can dramatically accelerate development and bug fixes.
!HOPE
!INDEED
!PIZZA
!WEIRD
Looks like it means that while the members of the dev team earn from their salaries by refactoring code, only some of such rewritten code actually improve the overall code (for present use and future development). π€π§ββοΈπ€―
I !HOPE to see you finally coding using your agentic AI (soon)! π€π€
!LOLZ
Sadly that's often does seem to be the case. As with any skill, there are only a few people that are very good at it.
Me too. I'm presently still working to stably run the two larger models that I have for any length of time without the ik_llama.cpp and llama-cpp-turboquant servers crashing. I haven't been feeling very good over the past few days, so I haven't had the energy, focus, or motivation to continue troubleshooting, which means that they haven't bee running for about 2 days now, though I do hope to get back to my testing soon. πππβ¨π€
!HOPE
!LOLZ
In that case, let's hope for dev teams to refactor code only if there is at least one team member that is (very) good at it !INDEED. π§ββοΈπ€
Your post which you published about 6 hours before that comment that contained the phrase my deeply broken/shattered heart, and my subsequent withdrawal from close and intimate human connections is so deep. π€π€― It looks like something really disrupted your "normal flow", which I !HOPE you restore soon. π§ββοΈπ€
Indeed, as it would likely be a disaster if it were not done that way.
Yes, true, and thank you, I appreciate that. Me too. πππβ¨π€
!HOPE
!INDEED
In general, even if there only is one member of a team that is great at a particular task, good communication would enable the entire team to work effectively towards the goal. π€π§ββοΈπ
I wouldn't have read that post if you hadn't said that you weren't feeling well. π§ββοΈπ€