Sometimes, the owner of a song sues the creator of a cover of his/her song for copyright even if it is because of the cover artist which made the owner's song actually popular !INDEED. 🤔🤯🤯😆
!WEIRD
!HOPE
!PEPE
That's pretty sad and small minded if you ask me. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!HOPE
!INDEED
!PEPE
!WEIRD
The owner could have just formed a partnership with the cover artist who made the original song actually successful (such as with a more-or-less 50% share of the profits) !INDEED. 🤔🧘♂️🤯🤓
!WEIRD
!HOPE
!PEPE
Yes, they could have done that. They could also have just felt thankful that someone thought that their song was worth to cover, and thanked them even. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!HOPE
!INDEED
!PEPE
!WEIRD
If they did such partnership, both original owner and cover artist would benefit from both popularity and revenue !INDEED, which is a win-win. 🤔🤯🤓 Some original creators seem to really not want it though. 🤯🤯
!WEIRD
!HOPE
!WINEX
Indeed, and I've noticed. Mutual benefit, and win-win dynamics, are not something they don't tend to like. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!HOPE
!INDEED
!WINE
!WEIRD
They have to realize first though their own benefit from such potential partnership before they engage with it. 🧘♂️
!PIXY
!ALIVE
That's true, and unfortunately many seem unaware or oblivious to such benefits. 😁🙏💚✨🤙
!ALIVE
!BBH
!PIXY