That sounds like a good plan. Ordinary rabbits with extraordinary goodness, I dig it. πππβ¨π€
!ALIVE
!BBH
!HOPE
!INDEED
!PIZZA
!WEIRD
That sounds like a good plan. Ordinary rabbits with extraordinary goodness, I dig it. πππβ¨π€
!ALIVE
!BBH
!HOPE
!INDEED
!PIZZA
!WEIRD
I don't think that they are just ordinary rabbits, because it takes so much (conscious) effort for a rabbit to be truly good !INDEED. π€― It's just what people see when an extraordinarily good rabbit is disguised as an ordinary one. π°ππ§ββοΈπ
!WEIRD !HOPE !PIZZA !WINEX
Goodness hidden inside, that works. πππβ¨π€
!ALIVE
!BBH
!HOPE
!INDEED
!PIZZA
!WEIRD
Only those with at least almost the same level of "goodness" will be able to detect such "hidden goodness" of those "extraordinarily good rabbits" !INDEED! π€π°ππ§ββοΈπ€π€
!HOPE
!WEIRD
!PIZZA
Well, that's the hope at least. The baddies may have very effective good-detection too. πππβ¨π€
!HOPE
!INDEED
!MMB
!STRIDE
!WEIRD
!ZOMBIE
That might mean that a rabbit (or people in general) has to be either "good" or "bad" (not "neutral", if that's even possible) to detect the "goodness" or "evilness" of another rabbit. π€π°ππ§ββοΈπ€―
Anyway, I think that there is something out of place with the words badies (with a single d) and good-detection (with a -) on your comment there. π€π€―π
Possibly so, though those of a neutral orientation would probably be able to easily detect both baddies and goodies.
I'll give you the first one, I missed a 'd', but the second one is fine. How is the 'd' on detection a problem? πππβ¨π€
!LOLZ
!WEIRD
The "neutral" rabbits, while being able to detect both (hidden) "goodness" and "evilness" inside other rabbits, it might not be as accurate as either the "good" or "evil" rabbits. π€π°ππ€―
I accidentally typed d !INSTEAD of "dash" or - again. π€―π€―π
!LOLZ
I don't know, since they are neutral, I think that any variance from complete neutrality would be very detectable by them.
Ah, OK, I see, and you seem to have been having a few of those accidents lately...lol! πππβ¨π€
LOLZ