And how does that invalidate my argument? Those same communities that prohibit writing with AI create and manage their own communities with AI. Pure hypocrisy.
Can they do it? Of course! Can they delete other people's votes? Of course! Can they exploit the common fund with their proposals? Of course!
But they're still hypocrites.
I think the difference is that this is a content driven ecosystem. Having people generate content with AI could be perceived as spam. Is like you having 'your diary' and people find out you never created any original thought and they thought they were reading you. AI could be a complement, but never a replacement.
So managing a community is not the goal of the community, but producing quality content is.