What is your take on AI generated content?

liotes in Threespeak • 19 hours ago

In today's Liotes Mission, we would like to talk about AI generated content. I would like you to look at the video to understand in which context I ask this question.

What is your take on AI generated content ? Should we be more open to accept AI generated content on Hive ?

Please leave your answer as a comment below this post.

The Liotes Mission

By taking part in the Liotes missions, you can win credits that will help you to increase your score and your title in the Liotes Ranking.

People who submit an answer will get 3 credits for the Liotes ranking. If you submit more than 1 answer, you will not get more credits.

We are very grateful if you enter the challenge within 24 hours after the post is published. We will try to count entries up to 36 hours after publication.

Liotes Divider Blue.png

Liotes

A project run by @ph1102 and @achim03

Resources

▶️ 3Speak

#tribes #bbh #alive #proofofbrain #pimp #archon #cent #ctp

19 hours ago in Threespeak by liotes

0.00 ALIVE

Sort:

Trending

[-]

stdd 18 hours ago

The world is racing forward, and it’s impossible to resist many things for more than a month. I wouldn’t want us to end up as a social network of old people for old people. We already have small (no, big) problems with that.
I’m all for any technologies, including AI for avatars, videos, and the like. Still, scripts and texts will have to be written by ourselves.
!ALIVE

0.00 ALIVE

1 vote

[-]

ekavieka 18 hours ago

iam still ok witht that, but most of the time it is used to generated a video that spread fear that I hate the most, usually in Facebook, or youtube short. If only there will be a standard that will always tag such video as AI generated, so it will be much easier tfor us to detect those kind of content.
!PIZZA !LUV

0.00 ALIVE

2 votes

[-]

stresskiller 18 hours ago

As long as the AI is supporting the post and not the main subject, i'm fine with it.
!PIMP

0.00 ALIVE

1 vote

[-]

ifarmgirl 17 hours ago

We are at a time where AI-generated content is becoming a thing. I think it's okay to welcome AI-aided content here, especially for video clips or images.

0.00 ALIVE

1 vote

[-]

proto26 16 hours ago

I think if it were used sparingly, I wouldn't mind. In fact I would encourage it. However, that is an ideal situation. The reality is most avid users of AI want it to generate the whole video or write the whole article for them while the human sits back with their feet up. It should enhance us, not replace us. If the human were to work alongside the AI, the end result might be a little more cohesive and less sloppy. Perhaps it might even be something of value.

0.00 ALIVE

1 vote

[-]

thebighigg 16 hours ago

We need to embrace it as long as it is stated to be AI content. If someone is passing off AI as their own work I find that dishonest personally. AI is here to stay, and better to take advantage of it as long as there are rules. Pure AI posts shouldn't be rewarded, but I think the content can still be valuable!

0.00 ALIVE

1 vote

[-]

ladymisa 15 hours ago

AI is the future. Embrace it instead of fighting it. :)

0.00 ALIVE

1 vote

[-]

dewabrata 15 hours ago

we have authors and curators, whether it is welcomed or not it will be back to the curators.

personally, I am more open to AI with some limitation and understanding, it is part of technology, why would we walk back to the past? every tech has it bad side, we need to adapt and adjust ourselves, not to fight it

0.00 ALIVE

1 vote

[-]

relf87 14 hours ago

Personally I don't have issues with AI content, as long as it's meaningful and not spam. Ultimately, it's up to the community to decide who we want to give our upvotes (or even downvotes). If people don't like AI content, they can just ignore, or if they think this person is abusing, they can downvote as well.

0.00 ALIVE

1 vote

[-]

ervin-lemark 14 hours ago (edited)

Before I listen/watch the video.

I take it !LOLZ

I am using genAI daily and frequently for work and private stuff. And no, I am not using it for publishing on social media platforms! With one exception so far: https://ecency.com/hive-196902/@ervin-lemark/late-checkout

The other question is how many trees do I chop with every chat query... This is something I am not comfortable with.

0.00 ALIVE

1 vote

[-]

palomap3 14 hours ago

As long as content created by AI is not pretended to be one's own, I have no problems. But it must be well differentiated, otherwise it seems dishonest and abusive to me.

AI is here to stay and has many advantages. Thanks to it I can understand people who speak other languages, for example. It makes no sense to close ourselves to the evolution of technology, the question is to give it an appropriate and honest use.

0.00 ALIVE

1 vote

[-]

seckorama 13 hours ago

Whenever AI is discussed, I always reiterate one thing: We cannot behave like Luddites here. Or can we? Well, then we/you will end up like some kind of last-days saints.
I often use Deepl, Grammarly, and Google Translate, and I suppose they use AI. Why do I use translators? Because English is not my native language, I want everything I write to be as understandable as possible to others.
I'm very involved in music, and my latest project with Suno is Stoner Now.
https://ecency.com/hive-193816/@seckorama/qdavufpmzz
And that's mine - I have all copyrights to that. And just started to learn AI videos...

0.00 ALIVE

1 vote

[-]

gwajnberg 10 hours ago

AI to help is good, but not do the whole work. If you are posting an art, posting an image is bad, if you are generating text content, you can use some images just to illustrate but the text should be human generated. I use it to discuss about topics that I am writing about, sometimes it can give me an information that I wasn't aware about a topic.

0.00 ALIVE

2 votes

[-]

pizzabot 18 hours ago

PIZZA!

$PIZZA slices delivered:
@ekavieka_(1/5) tipped @liotes

_{Send $PIZZA tips in Discord via tip.cc!}

0.00 ALIVE

[-]

vaynard86 9 hours ago

While the content (pictures, animation, video) can be generate by AI, the script, prompts and all needs to be human instead of AI generated.

0.00 ALIVE

[-]

coquicoin 8 hours ago

I have no problem with using AI as a tool to help improve your content, but I disagree with content generated exclusively with AI.

0.00 ALIVE

[-]

keithtaylor 6 hours ago

I see AI as a tool to help me produce better content. In much the same way as a spell checker, grammar checker, headline generator, etc does. And I applaud YouTube's decision to assist its users with AI.

I think that Hive should adopt similar methods to develop AI etiquette guidelines. Including:

When and how to make it clear that content is AI generated
If prompts or links to prompts used should be included in the post.
Any limitations on using AI

!BBH

0.00 ALIVE

[-]

edgerik 6 hours ago

I believe that AI generated content can be a valuable tool if used responsibly and ethically.
It can bring new perspectives and facilitate creative processes, but it's important to maintain a balance with human created content to preserve authenticity and personal connection.
On Hive, opening up to this type of content could enrich the platform, as long as it's clearly identified as AI generated and transparency is encouraged.

!ALIVE
!BBH
!WINE

0.00 ALIVE

[-]

darmst5339 1 hour ago

I am mixed about it. I have been working with the Microsoft AI CoPilot software on my laptop for various research, calculation and assistance with several programs. I have found the AI generated answers to be very helpful...AT TIMES... The form of the responses indicate or imply a certain level of knowledge. Sometimes it can be very misleading if you don't do your on due diligence on the side.

I believe AI created content can be very artistic but I would not yet trust it for anything of great importance. If the author highlighted that the content was AI generated, I would be fine with that. However I would not be fine with posting that did not acknowledge AI was involved in the contents creation.

0.00 ALIVE